Section 5.4 Ricky Show
¶Subsection 5.4.1 Moduli of PPAVs
Recall if \(A/ \CC\) is an abelian variety, then
Also a polarization \(\lambda \colon A \to A^\vee\) is equivalent to choosing a Riemann form
s.t.
- \(E\) is bilinear alternating
- \(E_\RR \colon V\times V \to \RR\) has \(E_\RR(iv,iw) = E_\RR( v,w)\text{.}\)
-
\begin{equation*} H(v,w) = E_\RR(iv, w) + i E_\RR(v,w) \end{equation*}is a positive definite Hermitian form on \(V\text{.}\)
A principal polarization corresponds to \(E\) being a perfect pairing.
Definition 5.4.1.
A PPAV (principally polarized abelian variety) is a pair \((A,\lambda)\text{.}\)
If \((\ZZ^{2g}, \Psi)\) is the standard \(2g\)-dim symplectic form \(\Psi\) then by linear algebra there is a symplectic isomorphism
with \(\Psi(v,w) = E(\alpha(v), \alpha(w))\text{.}\)
Recall the standard \(\Psi\) is
Definition 5.4.2.
The Siegel upper half space is
i.e. \(Y\) is pos. def.
Check: \(\mathscr H_1\) is the usual upper half plane.
Proposition 5.4.3.
\(\mathscr H_g \cong \Sp_{2g}(\RR)/U(g)\) where \(\Sp_{2g} (R) = \{ M \in \GL_{2g}(R) : M^\transpose J M = J\}\)
Proof.
(Sketch) First one can show that \(\Sp_{2g}(\RR)\) acts transitively on \(\mathscr H_g\) via linear fractional transformations:
second one computes \(\Stab J = U(g)\)
For \(g= 1\text{,}\) \(\Sp_2(\RR) = \SL_2(\RR)\) acts transitively on \(\mathscr H_1\text{,}\) \(\Stab(i) = \specialorthogonal (2) = U(1)\text{.}\)
and if
then \(ai + b = -c + di\) so \(M= \begin{pmatrix} a\amp b\\ -b \amp a \end{pmatrix}\in \specialorthogonal(2)\text{.}\)
Proposition 5.4.4.
There is a natural bijection between
this induces a bijection
Proof.
We will construct a map
first we construct a bijection between
and some linear data on a fixed space , so given \((A, \lambda, \alpha)\) use \(\alpha\) to identify
then tensor with \(\RR\) to get
the action of \(i\) on the right induces \(J\) on the left with \(J^2 = -I\text{.}\)
From \(E_\RR(iv,iw) = E_\RR(v,w)\) we get \(J \) symplectic
from \(E_\RR(iv,v) \gt 0\) we get \(J\) is positive
conversely given \(J\) symplectic positive \(J^2 = -I\) on \(\RR^{2g}\) we can construct \((A,\lambda) = (V/\ZZ^{2g}, E)\) This comes with an \(\alpha\) for free since \(H_1(A, \ZZ) \cong \ZZ^{2g}\text{.}\)
Suppose \(J\) and \(J_0\) are two complex structures, symplectic positive matrices on \(\RR^{2g}\text{.}\) Then a lemma from linear algebra tells us that there exists a \(S \in \Sp_{2g}(\RR)\text{.}\) s.t. \(J_0 = S J S \inv\text{.}\) We see that this \(S\) is well defined up to an element of \(G = Z(J) \cap \Sp_{2g}(\RR)\text{.}\) But if \(\gamma \in G \) then \(\gamma\) preserves the associated \(\CC\)-str. on \(\RR^{2g}\text{.}\) then since \(\gamma\) is symplectic, it preserves
implies
Subsection 5.4.2 Hodge structures
Let \(M\) be a \(\cinf\) compact \(\RR\)-manifold. Then \(H^i_{\mathrm{sing}}(M, \RR) \cong H^i_\dR(M)\text{.}\) What about for compact \(\CC\)-manifolds \(X\text{?}\) For \(M\) have \(H^i_\dR(M) = H^i(\Omega^\bullet (M))\text{.}\) This won't give de Rham isomorphism for \(X\text{:}\)
supported up to \(i = 2d\) with \(d = \dim_\CC(X)\text{.}\) but \(H^i(\Omega^\bullet_{\mathrm{hol}}(C))\) is supported up to \(i = d\text{.}\)
For \(M\)
is a resolution of \(\underline \RR\) by acyclic sheaves, by the existence of \(\cinf\) bump functions.
For \(X\) this doesn't work with \(\Omega_{\mathrm{hol}}^\bullet\) as there are no holomorphic bump functions.
is still a resolution but not acyclic. Instead we use hypercohomology which takes as input any resolution and outputs a cohomology group. This has the property that
so we define \(H^i_\dR(X) = \mathbf H^i(\Omega_X^\bullet)\text{.}\) so that
On \(X\) we have the sheaf of \((p,q)\) forms \(\Omega^{p,q}\) These are locally given by
We have
satisfying \(\bar \partial ^2 = 0\text{.}\) So we can define \(H^{p,q}(X) = \ker \bar \partial/ \im \bar \partial\) (Dolbeaut cohomology).
Theorem 5.4.5. Hodge decomposition.
For a compact Kahler manifold (e.g. \(X\) a projective variety) we have
Remark 5.4.6.
using \(\bar \partial\) Poincaré lemma
Example 5.4.7.
\(E/\CC\) elliptic curve.
outer terms 0, diamond is 1 , 1 , 1, 1.
Definition 5.4.8. Hodge structures.
A Hodge structure on \(V/\RR\) is a \(\ZZ\)-bigrading on \(V_\CC = V \otimes \CC\) such that
its of Hodge type \(S\subseteq \ZZ^2\) if \(V^{pq} \ne 0 \) iff \((p,q) \in S\text{,}\)
Example 5.4.9.
the Hodge decomposition gives a hodge structure on \(H^n_{\mathrm{sing}}(X, \RR)\text{.}\)
If \(V\) has a hodge structure of weight \(n\) (i.e. \(V^{pq} \ne 0\) iff \(p,q = n\)). Then we can recover the hodge structure from the associated hodge filtration
Example 5.4.10.
Exercise 5.4.11.
in weight \(n\text{.}\)
Alternative definition.
Proposition 5.4.12.
There is a natural bijection between morphisms of algebraic groups
and Hodge structures on \(V\text{.}\)
Hence for any lie group \(G\) we can define a hodge structure on \(G\) as a morphism of algebraic groups
If \(G \to \GL(V)\) is a faithful rep this induces a hodge structure on \(V\text{.}\)
Definition 5.4.13.
A polarization of a HS \(h\colon \mathbf S \to \GL(v)\) is an alternating bilinear form
with
- \begin{equation*} \Psi (Jv,Jw) = \Psi(v,w) \text{ for } J = h(i) \end{equation*}
- \begin{equation*} \Psi(v,Jw) \text{ is pos. def.} \end{equation*}