Section 5.5 Variations of Hodge Structures (Sachi)
¶Subsection 5.5.1 Review of Hodge Theory
\(X\) complex manifold \(X\subseteq \PP^N\) which is \(m\)-dimensional. For each \(n\) associate to \(X\)
we have a bilinear pairing
where \(\omega\) is a generator of \(H^2( \PP^N , \ZZ)\) restricted to \(X\text{.}\) This gives us the set-up of \(X\) as a differentiable manifold. Now say something about complex structure. We have a decomposition of differential forms on \(X\)
degree \(n\) forms decomposing as a combination of type \(p,q\) forms.
Hodge theorem descends to a decomposition on cohomology
unless \(p+p' = q+q' = n\text{.}\)
A hodge structure of weight \(n\) is the data \((H_\ZZ, Q)\) satisfying the Hodge decomposition, Bilinearity
Questions:
- To what extent does the HS of \(X\) determine \(X\text{?}\) (Torelli problem)
- To what extent can we read off the geometric data of \(X\) from its Hodge structure.
Subsection 5.5.2 Variations of Hodge structures:
Let \(Y \subseteq X\) be codimension \(k\text{,}\) this gives a class in
what about the converse?
For each cohomology class \(\gamma\) in \(H^{2k} (X,\CC)\) is \(\gamma\) a rational linear combination of classes of subvarieties. (Hodge conjecture).
Subsubsection 5.5.2.1 Hodge theory for curves
\((H_\ZZ, Q)\text{,}\) \(H^{1,0} \oplus H^{0,1}\) have the period matrix
each \(E_\lambda \leftrightarrow H^{1,0} \oplus H^{0,1}\) so can ask as \(\lambda\) varies we can ask how \(H^{1,0}\) is situated inside of \(H^{1,0} \oplus H^{0,1}\text{.}\)
pairing with \(H_1(X)\)
For \(B\) a variety \(\{X_b\}\) are varieties with Hodge structures for each \(b\in B\text{.}\) Locally we can identify
and \(H_\CC \) with that of \(X_{b_0}\text{.}\)
Then consider
or the associated
subspaces of \(H_\CC\text{.}\)
Question: What is a moduli space of linear subspaces?
Answer: The grassmanian!
of \(k\)-dimensional subspaces of a fixed vector space \(V\text{.}\) What is the tangent space to the Grassmanian at a point \(W\subseteq V\text{?}\)
if we take the complementary subspace \(W \oplus C = V\) given another subspace
have \(\pi_{W'}, \pi_C\)
by \(\pi_C \circ (\pi_W|_{W'})\inv\text{.}\)
Fact 5.5.1.
- \(\phi\colon B\to {\mathrm{Gr}}\) mapping \(b \mapsto F^k(X_b) \subseteq H_\CC\) is holomorphic.
- In terms of identifying the tangent space of the grassmanian to the hom set, the image under\begin{equation*} \diff \phi_k = \delta_k \end{equation*}of any tangent vector of \(B\) at \(b_0\) carries \(F^{k} \) to \(F^{k+1}/F^k\) so we have maps\begin{equation*} \delta_k \colon T_{b_0} B \to \Hom(H^{n-k,k} (X), H^{n-k-1, k+1}(X)) \end{equation*}satisfying\begin{equation*} \delta_{k+1} (V) \circ \delta_k(W) = \delta_{k+1}(W) \circ \delta_k(W) \end{equation*}for all \(v,w\in T\text{.}\)
Since \(F^k(X_b)\) satisfy
for all \(b\text{.}\)
for all \(\alpha\in H^{n-k, k}(X)\text{,}\) \(\beta \in H^{k+1, n-k - 1}(X)\) for \(v \in T\)
Definition 5.5.2. Infinitesimal variation of Hodge structures.
An infinitesimal variation of Hodge structures is
Two observations:
Remark 5.5.3.
Variations of hodge structures are often computable, e.g. for hypersurfaces in \(\PP^N\text{.}\)
let \(X = \{ f = 0 \}\) of \(\deg d\text{.}\)
Lefschetz implies the only interesting cohomology is in the middle dimension.
Poincaré residues of \(n+1\) forms of \(\PP^{n+1}\) with poles along \(X\)
graded parts \(H^{p,q}(X)\)
Problem 5.5.4.
Identify \(H_\ZZ\) inside of \(H^n\)
Solution: VHS \(\delta_k\) maps turn out to be polynomial multiplication \(d\ge n+1\text{.}\)
Theorem 5.5.5. Noether-Lefschetz.
A surface \(S \subseteq \PP^4\) of degree \(d \ge 4\) having general moduli contains no curves other than complete intersections \(S \cap T\) with other surfaces \(T\text{.}\)